87 665
订阅者
-2224 小时
-1257 天
-47430 天
帖子存档
显示全部...
👍 150❤ 55🙏 19🤡 16🖕 7🔥 6💩 2❤🔥 1🤔 1
Benny Johnson Reports:
BREAKING: AG Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel have reportedly submitted documents to Congress revealing the Clinton Foundation took donations from foreign and domestic sources seeking influence.
“Officials told Just the News that the documents were transmitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee in recent days and detail numerous instances of foreigners and even a U.S. defense contractor seeking to curry favor with the Clintons through donations to their family charity, including when Hillary Clinton served as secretary of State. Bill Clinton was a U.S. president from 1993 to 2001.”
“The officials said some of the evidence was flagged by whistleblowers who claimed such evidence was kept from a corruption investigation that was being conducted in 2015 by the Little Rock, Ark., U.S. attorney’s office before it was shut down by the Obama administration's Justice Department.”
❤ 233🔥 198👍 60🤡 20🙏 17🥱 13🌭 7👀 5💯 3⚡ 2🎅 2
Newsom, Eyeing 2028, Tries to Mess With Texas: ‘Don’t Poke the Bear’
Game plan:
Full scale immigrant invasion in 2028
💩 177🤬 66🤣 28❤ 9🌭 9😈 5🖕 4👀 4😡 2🤡 1
https://www.youtube.com/live/ClPBz9JYwE8?si=GuRKp5eRH5UIAbhR
Special Guest Border Journalist Oscar Ramirez
🙏 109❤ 35👍 21🤡 15🖕 11💩 5❤🔥 2🥴 2🔥 1🕊 1
Stewart Swerdlow made a BOLD statement Friday on Ninoscorner.tv saying his intel told him the Government Shutdown would end by Nov 14th.. WOW
🤔 165🔥 61👍 49❤ 25🤡 15💯 7💩 5😭 5🌭 3👏 1
Oscar Ramirez “ Mexico is Now More Dangerous Than GAZA” is up NOW on Ninoscorner.tv
👍 118🙏 63❤ 19🤡 10🖕 10💩 6😢 3🌭 2😐 1
01:07
视频不可用在 Telegram 中显示
Oscar Ramirez is boots on the ground journalist in Mexico. He’s states Mexico is now more dangerous than GAZA and thousands are dying everyday. Mexico is the number 1 most dangerous country in the world.. Immigrants are still arriving from all over the world and waiting patiently at the southern border for election 2028 to invade America. This will be on Ninoscorner.tv TODAY
IMG_9749.MOV24.24 MB
🔥 167🙏 105😱 50🤡 29❤ 27💩 10🖕 8👎 4🤣 3💋 3🌭 2
显示全部...
🙏 81❤ 37🤡 22👍 16👎 7💩 2❤🔥 1🌭 1
显示全部...
🔥 106❤ 39🤔 23🤡 23👍 15💩 11🙏 9👎 6🖕 3💋 2❤🔥 1
01:00
视频不可用在 Telegram 中显示
Zohran Mamdani Will Implode.. Sheila Holm joins Ninoscorner.tv to break Intel on Mamdani, JD Vance and the coming sealed indictments..
IMG_9728.MOV21.80 MB
💯 312🙏 140🔥 34👍 30❤ 23🥱 12💩 9🤡 8❤🔥 4👏 1
显示全部...
👍 106😨 26❤ 24🤡 15💩 8🙏 8🍾 8❤🔥 6🌭 3
NOW THIS NINO!
30 more FBI subpoenas related to Russiagate investigations are going out today and tomorrow.
❤ 308👏 197🙏 79😎 33🤡 14🥱 11👍 10🔥 6🤣 2🤔 1🌭 1
00:30
视频不可用在 Telegram 中显示
She’s SENILE
IMG_9719.MP48.57 MB
🤣 737🤮 312🖕 138🤡 85😁 22🙈 14❤ 13👎 7💯 7🌭 6🦄 5
Tomorrow New York Albanian Muslim Socialite podcaster Bek Lover, will be joining my YouTube morning show @ 9:30am mst to explain why he and other Muslims are now fleeing New York City for good after the Mamdani Mayoral win.. This should be a great conversation. Please join our discussion!
👍 223🔥 45❤ 21🤔 20🤡 11🙏 7💩 5👎 4🤣 3
Larry Ballard is back on Ninoscorner.tv !! Larry explains in an educational PowerPoint presentation what Trumps new America will look like!
💯 123👍 59🙏 26🤡 9❤ 4🖕 4👎 2🍌 2💩 1
Forwarded to me:
HERE WE GO!!!
🚨 Supreme Court Justices Grill Trump's Tariff Authority in Oral Arguments
Given what I just heard and following this, I believe The Supreme Court is LIKELY to UPHOLD the President's authority to impose tariffs.
🔻 Breakdown:
- Justice Kavanaugh questions the "odd donut hole" in the statute: why the President can shut down all trade or impose quotas with every country but not a 1% tariff, arguing it lacks common sense.
- Benjamin Gutman argues tariffs are a fundamentally different power—akin to taxation for revenue—while the statute authorizes controlling or freezing trade, like embargoes, not revenue-raising measures.
- Gutman emphasizes context matters; no other federal statute uses "regulate" to authorize tariffs or taxes, and tariffs fall under commerce power, not taxation, citing historical figures like John Marshall and Joseph Story.
- Justice Barrett notes the interpretation allows embargoes on global trade but bars minor tariffs, probing if tariffs undermine the statute's goal of controlling transactions during emergencies.
- Gutman clarifies embargoes ensure hard limits (e.g., no more than 1,000 units imported), while tariffs only add costs without guaranteeing control, potentially allowing trade to continue.
- Justice Jackson challenges why blocking all trade isn't a bigger deal than a small tariff, and questions reliance on the Algonquin case, which was statutory interpretation, not constitutional.
- Gutman responds that Algonquin looked at text, context, and legislative history, suggesting Congress intended emergency powers for stopping trade, not revenue generation.
- Justices discuss framers' concerns: revenue-raising powers were core to Article I, posing different risks than trade controls, and tariffs might create incentives misaligned with emergency goals.
🔻Overall Lean of SCOTUS Judges:
Remember, this is a bite sized morsel of the entire argument.
- Conservative Justices (e.g., Kavanaugh, possibly Alito based on related reports) appear more open to the administration's interpretation, questioning the limitations on presidential tariff authority and expressing concern about removing it from the "suite of tools" for economic emergencies.
- Liberal Justices (e.g., Jackson, possibly others) seem to be probing the breadth of presidential power, potentially leaning towards a narrower interpretation that aligns with historical and constitutional concerns about revenue-raising authorities.
🔻 My Educated Guess on the Decision:
Given the current composition of the Supreme Court and the oral arguments, it is likely that the majority WILL SIDE with the administration, upholding the President's authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
The conservative majority, particularly Kavanaugh and possibly Alito, seem concerned about limiting presidential tools in economic emergencies, and the historical and contextual arguments presented by Gutman may resonate with them.
However, the end decision might be narrow, focusing on the specific statutory interpretation rather than broadly expanding presidential power, to garner a majority that includes some swing votes like Chief Justice Roberts or Justice Barrett.
🔻 When to Expect an Answer?
Given that oral arguments occurred on November 5, 2025, we can expect a decision sometime between late May and early July 2026, likely closer to June 2026, as is customary for major cases.
I’m feeling very good about this. Don’t pay attention to the doom and gloomers. This is destiny!
❤ 227🙏 169👍 36🍾 15🔥 11💩 6🤡 5👀 4

