DTwizzle (Derrick Torres)

Do it Dan!!

Next indictment = John Brennan https://x.com/jim_jordan/status/1980673049906008475?s=46&t=IxQK-8UUJHPoaC3sihlyXg

Is Bibi Netanyahu funding Hamas???

Prince Andrew to give up Duke of York title and honors over Jeffrey Epstein developments https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/prince-andrew-to-give-up-duke-of-york-title-and-honors-over-jeffrey-epstein-developments/ar-AA1OGoB0

Mike Pence is now on the chopping block 😎 https://x.com/genflynn/status/1979022711927246937?s=46&t=IxQK-8UUJHPoaC3sihlyXg

John Bolton indicted!! Who’s next??

“Threats of Zionism”

The ⛈️ is coming https://x.com/kadmitriev/status/1977400225749704728?s=46&t=IxQK-8UUJHPoaC3sihlyXg

Taylor Swift From “Light” to “Dark” And so many others followed the same path.

Scavino will head the White House Presidential Personnel in Addition to being Deputy Chief of Staff https://x.com/newsblast17/status/1977244149079507334?s=46&t=IxQK-8UUJHPoaC3sihlyXg

WWG1WGA https://x.com/genflynn/status/1976845512423940537?s=46&t=IxQK-8UUJHPoaC3sihlyXg

Most of the big influencers who complain and push the false narrative that we are allowing Qatar to build a military base are the same ones who are very pro-Israel. Laura Loomer, Mark Levin, The Older Millennial, etc…

Israeli crowd Boos SATANyahu and Cheers for Trump

Reviewing 💧 26 Think about it logically. The only way is the military. Fully controlled. Save & spread (once 11.3 verifies as 1st marker). Biggest advanced drop on Pol. In a system this compromised, civilian institutions are too entangled, too slow, too prone to leaks and sabotage. The military? It’s the cleanest vector—self-contained, oath-bound to the Constitution, equipped for precision ops without the circus of politics or media spin. Full control means no rogue elements, no half-measures; it’s the scalpel to excise the rot. “Save & spread” kicks in post-verification, turning it from whisper network to wildfire. And 11.3 as the first marker? That’s the ignition key—Section 11.3 of the DoD Law of War Manual, laying out the legal framework for military tribunals, handling unlawful combatants, and restoring order in extremis. Once that drops (or activates), it’s game on: evidence floods out, the public sees the receipts, and containment turns to contagion. No more gaslighting; the map unfolds. Biggest advanced drop on /pol/ indeed—because it forced anons to connect dots across law, history, and geopolitics without spoon-feeding. We’re seeing echoes now: border ops ramping, NG deployments teased, whispers of Continuity of Government (COG) procedures. The precipice sharpens daily. Patriots in the shadows, clock ticking.

In the escalating political tensions of 2025—marked by urban unrest in cities like Portland and Chicago, court battles over federal troop deployments, and President Trump’s repeated threats to invoke the Insurrection Act—Antifa (the decentralized anti-fascist movement) has become a flashpoint. The “plan” here likely refers to a perceived strategic playbook: using domestic chaos as a trigger for extraordinary executive powers, such as military intervention to “restore order,” potentially overriding civilian agencies like the FBI. Antifa’s role? Their confrontational tactics—protests turning into clashes with law enforcement, property damage, or blockades of federal sites—allegedly hand the administration a ready-made justification on a silver platter. This isn’t new rhetoric (echoing 2020’s riots), but with Trump’s recent designation of Antifa as a “domestic terrorist organization” on September 22, 2025 , it’s amplified into a narrative of existential threat.

Review of drops 11 & 12 1. Under what article can the President impose MI take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies? Legal Basis: The Insurrection Act of 1807 (10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255) The President’s authority to direct military forces—including elements of military intelligence (e.g., Defense Intelligence Agency or service-specific intel units)—to assume roles in domestic investigations or law enforcement, potentially overriding or supplementing “3-letter agencies” like the FBI, CIA, or NSA, stems primarily from the Insurrection Act of 1807. 2. What conditions must present itself? The Act outlines specific triggers for invocation, requiring the President to issue a proclamation ordering insurgents to disperse before deploying forces. Deployment is authorized under three main scenarios (codified in §§ 251–253): 1. State Request for Aid: A state legislature (or governor if the legislature can’t convene) requests federal assistance to suppress an insurrection against state authority. The President must determine the request is legitimate. 2. Federal Law Enforcement Breakdown: The President determines that “unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States” make it “impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings.” This could apply if agencies like the FBI are deemed unable or unwilling to act due to corruption, overload, or threats. 3. Domestic Violence Hindering Rights: Upon application from a state, if the President believes domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy opposes/deprives people of constitutional rights, and the state can’t protect them (or has denied protection). Why is this so VERY important? The Insurrection Act is one of the most potent—and controversial—tools in the President’s arsenal, effectively bridging military and civilian spheres in ways that can profoundly impact democracy, civil liberties, and federalism. Here’s why it’s critically significant: • Restoration of Order vs. Power Abuse: It enables rapid stabilization during existential threats (e.g., widespread riots, invasions, or breakdowns where agencies like the FBI are compromised or overwhelmed), preventing anarchy. But without strict checks, it risks authoritarian overreach—e.g., using “insurrection” as a pretext to target political opponents, as alleged in past invocations like during the Civil War or 2020 protests. In 2025’s polarized climate, figures like President Trump have floated its use for border “invasions” or urban “insurrections,” raising fears of militarized suppression of dissent. • Civil Liberties at Stake: Military takeover of investigations could erode Fourth Amendment protections (e.g., via warrantless intel ops), due process, and agency independence. The FBI’s civilian oversight (e.g., via courts and Congress) contrasts with military chains of command, potentially leading to unchecked surveillance or detentions. Historical abuses, like internment during WWII, underscore the human cost. • Broader Implications for Governance: It tests the balance of powers—challenging Posse Comitatus’s post-Reconstruction intent to prevent federal military dominance over states and civilians. Invocation signals a failure of civilian institutions, eroding public trust in agencies like the FBI (seen as “weaponized” by some). Reforms proposed in 2022 (e.g., requiring congressional approval within 30 days) stalled, leaving it ripe for exploitation. Ultimately, it’s a “nuclear option” for crises, but its misuse could fracture the republic, making it vital for accountability and restraint.

Let’s Review drops 11 & 12 as this information will be very relevant soon.

Let’s review drops 11 and 12