Robert W Malone, MD

The World Health Organization has recommended around 200 IU of daily Vitamin D for 20 years. But a "schoolboy error" from the Institutes of Medicine reveals they should have been getting 8,895 IU. That's 44 x MORE than the WHO recommends. Dr. John Campbell @DrJohnCampbell: "It means in the United States, the recommended amount of vitamin D is 15 times too low [and] in the United Kingdom it's 22 times lower than it should be" How can Governments trust the WHO with managing Pandemics if they can't get Vit D right? full video: https://t.me/DrJohnCampbell/827 Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES

Sunday Strip: The Limited Hangout and other bad choices https://www.malone.news/p/sunday-strip-the-limited-hangout 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

The Limited Hangout Blame Congress for the Epstein mess- they passed the bill where the government could redact whatever the heck they wanted. Now, the public will never know how involved our government (IC), foreign governments or corporations were in setting up honey pots, blackmailing politicians, business people, and government officials, etc. Congress knew exactly what would happen. Including those who are now screaming the loudest - and who also happened to be the same Congress critters who put in the amendments that the government could redact whatever they wanted. Congress was protecting their own in doing what they did. Now they can blame the DoJ for redacting, pat themselves on the back for doing the right thing. It is total BS. They set this up. Don't blame Bondi for doing what they wanted. 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Policy (acip) is an ADVISORY committee. It does not make policy. It advises the Director of the CDC. It is chartered under the Federal ADVISORY Committee Act. Political appointees make policy. Like the CDC Director. What is so hard to understand about this? It is the way the law is written. This is nothing new, and it is not nefarious. ---- By charter and authorization, the advisory committee on immunization practices is also required to be independent. Independent of the cdc bureaucracy, independent of the medical guilds, and independent of pharma. That is the law. 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

Bioweapons Treaty Update - Progress! Steps towards verification https://www.malone.news/p/bioweapons-treaty-update-progress 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

Garden variety contrails. Know the difference. 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed. 22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively. 23. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper intimidation with blackmail or other threats. 24. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen 25. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen. 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

16. Vanishing evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue. 17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can “argue” with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues. 18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how “sensitive they are to criticism”. 19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the “play dumb” rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance. 20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications. 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the “high road” and “confess” with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made — but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, “just isn’t so.” Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for “coming clean” and “owning up” to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues. 12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues. 13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact. 14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10. 15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place. 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning — simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint. 7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive. 8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough “jargon” and “minutiae” to illustrate you are “one who knows”, and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources. 9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect. 10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually them be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues — so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source. 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

The 25 Rules of Disinformation. #PsyWar . Great stuff. https://thetusk.org/Rules-for-Radicals.html 1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues. 2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the “How dare you!” gambit. 3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such “arguable rumors”. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a “wild rumor” which can have no basis in fact. 4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues. 5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues. 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

New Orders from Trump on Health More big MAHA wins! https://www.malone.news/p/new-orders-from-trump-on-health 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

👆👆👆 True story 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

“Leave the cocooning to the caterpillars.” Dr. Robert Malone @RWMaloneMD is sounding the alarm on people pushing policies that require vaccination to see newborn babies, saying the practice is not supported by science. “There’s a policy that is being advocated by many using the hashtag ‘no vax, no visit.’” “What I’m talking about is called cocooning.” “Parents increasingly are saying that grandparents… can’t be around their new grandchild if they haven’t been fully vaccinated.” “This was a policy promoted by the ACIP historically without any data.” Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES

Robert Malone just revealed the truth about "cocooning" Grandparents (and close family members) are urged to get vaccinated against pertussis (with Tdap) before being around their newborn grandchild. But the Godfather of Vaccines admits this policy is not based on science. @RWMaloneMD recently revealed to @MAHA_Action that vaccination can still potentially allow asymptomatic transmission to the baby, meaning vaccinated adults might carry and spread the bacteria without getting sick themselves. He also revealed major new changes that could be taking place as the ACIP moves to implement recommendations that support informed consent. Watch the "godfather of vaccines," Dr. Stanley Plotkin (who mentored Paul Offit), admit the pertussis vaccine doesn't stop transmission ... and that we'll likely never be able to conduct the human trials needed to prove if it does. DEPOSITION BY AARON SIRI: "Does the pertussis vaccine prevent infection and transmission of pertussis in the vaccinated person?" PLOTKIN: "They don't protect the individual from carrying the organism... those data are based largely on animal studies... and there is a concern that the vaccine may not protect an individual from passing the organism to another individual, even if the vaccinated person doesn't get sick." Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES

📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

Attention, everyone! 🎉 Barbara O’Neill’s voice cannot be muted! Big Pharma is trying to ban this groundbreaking book... You won't want to miss "Sustain Me" in 2025/26! Our CHRISTMAS SALE is here—act fast for an incredible 80% discount, today only! ⚠️ Use the code "CHRISTMAS10" for an extra 10% off! 🎁 Seize this opportunity while it lasts! ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://shortll.com/SelfHeal https://shortll.com/SelfHeal

Friday Funnies: Locusts Invade and other true stories. For more memes, video and cartoons - click on the link: https://www.malone.news/p/friday-funnies-locusts-invade 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

This guidance was issued in 2018 by the AAP, and soon after- the number of pediatricians rejecting patients based on vaccine status was documented in a 2020 JAMA poll. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2770611 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

The AAP has issued a clinical report (guidance) that states it is an “acceptable option for pediatric care clinicians to dismiss families who refuse vaccines.” This paved the way for pediatricians/ hospital groups and probably insurance companies to endorse the concept of firing patients for being "non-compliant." https://www.infectiousdiseaseadvisor.com/news/new-aap-policy-on-patient-dismissal-for-vaccine-refusal-may-erode-solidarity-among-pediatricians/ 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD