Kate Shemirani Official

https://www.falmouthpacket.co.uk/news/25651060.cornwall-first-uk-saying-no-mandatory-digital-id-cards/ Get with Cornwall

Have a blessed day ahead

Have a "love"ly day ahead everyone ❤️

The singleton ❤️

Make your own veggie cubes

Fluoride, chlorine...

"Unbelievable! Outrageous BS. Nature doesn’t have enough supporting data for safety, but their chemicals are fine even after millions of deaths and injuries they’ve made themselves legally immune from all liability from…. That’s fine. You can’t stop this evil system with their system. Think about that please. -Air The UK has reached a new peak of insanity. Turkey tail and cordyceps mushroom products are now being removed from UK shelves and cannot be legally sold as food or supplements due to a new crackdown by the Food Standards Agency (FSA) re-classifying these mushrooms as "novel foods" because they lacked "significant consumption" in the UK/EU before May 15, 1997. This is an extremely bad faith argument because both mushrooms are revered across East Asia (including China, Japan, Korea, and the Himalayas) as potent adaptogens and tonics with zero recorded safety concerns in traditional medicine for hundreds to thousands of years. Turkey tail grows abundantly in UK forests. So someone please explain how the turkey tail that literally grows wild in the UK is any different than what's been used for thousands of years in a nearby culture? There are zero cases of side effects or toxicity. Also consider that functional mushrooms are the chosen target here, not the Phthalates, bisphenols (BPA), pesticides, heavy metals, PFAS ("forever chemicals") and literally over 10,000 chemicals routinely added to foods in the UK. They will tell you it's not a "ban" but actually just a newly required costly pre-market authorisation (typically affordable only by large companies) but the truth is no artisan company actually making a real quality mushroom product that uses turkey tail or cordyceps will be able to jump through the hoops of these "authorisations". As of now in the UK mushrooms cannot be legally sold as food or supplements. This has forced UK businesses like Bristol Fungarium, Mushies UK, Mogo Farm, and Marvellous Mushrooms to remove products from shelves, despite the mushrooms' centuries-old use in traditional medicine (e.g., turkey tail as a cancer adjunct in Japan) and no evidence of safety risks. This is a trial run, to see how the population reacts. If there's not enough pushback, you know they're coming for where you live next. This is the on-going battle that will continue to be waged against natural foods and herbal medicines. Share this and let's get the word out that this is unacceptable." T.me/ArtWithAim

Holding the Food Industry Accountable at Last San Francisco City Attorney’s Office has just launched a historic lawsuit against some of the largest manufacturers of ultra-processed foods: • Kraft Heinz Company — a giant behind Lunchables, processed cheeses, ready-to-eat meals and many other ultra-processed staples. • Mondelez International — maker of household brands like Oreo, Chips Ahoy, and many snack cookies and treats. • The Coca‑Cola Company — a global beverage titan, long criticised for sugary drinks. • PepsiCo — another major drinks/snacks corporation. • Post Holdings — known for processed cereals and other packaged foods. • General Mills — maker of many breakfast cereals and processed food products. • Nestlé USA — the U.S. arm of a global food conglomerate, with many processed-food brands under its umbrella. • Kellogg Company — known for cereals, snacks, convenience foods associated with ultra-processed diets. • Mars, Incorporated — known for snacks, sweets, and processed foods. • Conagra Brands — producer of processed meals, snacks and other mass-market food products The lawsuit argues these companies engineered a public-health crisis: designing foods for maximum addictiveness, marketing them aggressively; often targeting children and vulnerable communities, and downplaying or hiding their long-term health harms including obesity, diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and other chronic conditions: • Deceptive advertising / misrepresentation — marketing UPFs as “normal” or safe foods, often implying they are healthy or innocuous. • Failure to warn — not clearly informing consumers about health risks (e.g. high risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, fatty-liver disease, etc.) tied to heavy UPF consumption. • Targeting vulnerable populations — including children, low-income families, and minority communities. • Negligence and breach of implied/express warranties — since food should reasonably be safe for ordinary use. • The health harms allegedly linked to UPFs include obesity, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, various chronic conditions. • In broad frames: the lawsuit argues that these companies engineered foods to maximize profit — using additives, flavor enhancers, shelf-life extenders and aggressive marketing — at the expense of public health. This is the first lawsuit of its kind in the United States, and it seeks not just financial penalties but structural change: real warnings, real accountability, and an end to deceptive marketing practices that have normalised chemical-laden “food” as everyday nutrition. https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel