Natural News

How forced immunizations, fraudulent science and corporate greed have endangered public health Throughout history, humanity has witnessed the same tragic patterns repeat—vaccines introduced with promises of safety and efficacy, only to later reveal devastating consequences. From the smallpox vaccine in 1798 to the COVID-19 shots in 2021, the cycle remains eerily consistent: mass injuries, institutional denial and a society acclimated to suffering. A forgotten legacy of harm The smallpox vaccine, the first widely mandated immunization, was quickly linked to outbreaks of the very disease it claimed to prevent. Doctors observed strange, debilitating injuries—many resembling encephalitis (brain inflammation) and encephalopathy (brain damage). Yet, rather than acknowledging the risks, governments doubled down, enforcing mandates while cases surged. This pattern repeated with early rabies, typhoid and tuberculosis vaccines in the 1800s and early 1900s. Poor quality control led to "hot lots"—batches that killed or severely injured recipients. Doctors documented cranial nerve damage, seizures, paralysis and intellectual decline, yet these reports were buried. By the 1940s, the original DPT (diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus) vaccine entered the market, notorious for causing brain inflammation. Generations raised under mass vaccination saw skyrocketing rates of learning disabilities, hyperactivity and antisocial behavior—conditions rarely seen before. The cover-ups continue From the 1950s to the 1970s, rushed vaccines—like the polio and swine flu shots—were pushed during "emergencies," only to later be exposed as dangerous. Scandals erupted, victims were compensated and then… silence. The public forgot, and the cycle repeated. In 1986, lawsuits over DPT-induced brain damage and sudden infant deaths forced Congress to pass the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, shielding manufacturers from liability while pretending to help injured families. The result? A gold rush of new vaccines, ballooning schedules and skyrocketing chronic illness. The anthrax vaccine deployed during the Gulf War injured over 100,000 servicemen, causing "Gulf War Syndrome." The HPV (Gardasil) vaccine, falsely marketed as preventing cervical cancer (which kills only 1 in 38,000 women annually), triggered autoimmune disorders—yet the CDC and FDA protected it at all costs. And then came COVID-19. The parallels are undeniable: rushed development, suppressed safety concerns and a tsunami of injuries—heart failure, neurological damage, infertility and death—all while governments and media gaslighted the public. The evidence they don't want you to see Despite relentless suppression, independent researchers have uncovered disturbing truths: 1. Clinical trials show harm – Studies prove vaccines cause autoimmune disorders, with each subsequent dose increasing risk. 2. Large datasets confirm dangers – A recent analysis of 99 million people found COVID shots 2-7 times more likely to cause life-threatening conditions than traditional vaccines. 3. Unvaccinated children are healthier – Pediatrician Paul Thomas, MD, compared his patients and found unvaccinated children had dramatically lower rates of asthma, allergies, ADHD and autism. His study was retracted, his license revoked. 4. Mechanisms of injury exist – Vaccines trigger microstrokes, autoimmune attacks on the brain and unresolved cellular stress responses—explaining conditions like autism, seizures and cognitive decline. The societal cost of mass vaccination In his groundbreaking book, Harris Coulter argued that vaccines didn't just cause autism—they reshaped society by damaging brains en masse. Symptoms of minimal brain damage (MBD)—hyperactivity, poor impulse control, learning disabilities—mirrored post-encephalitic disorders. 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Meanwhile, the psychological and physiological harms of prolonged mask use—reduced oxygen intake, bacterial infections, impaired childhood development—were ignored. Conclusion: Science vs. dogma The truth is clear: Masks don't work. The pre-2020 literature, the Cochrane Review and decades of infection control expertise all confirm it. But when facts collide with political agendas, the facts lose—unless the public demands accountability. Censorship of dissenting science is a hallmark of authoritarian regimes. If we value truth over dogma, we must reject the purge of evidence and restore honest debate. The question remains: Who benefits from keeping the public in the dark? The answer is obvious—and it isn't you. According to BrightU. AI's Enoch, the censorship of mask science exposes the deep corruption of institutions that claim to "follow the science" while actively suppressing inconvenient truths—this is part of the globalist agenda to enforce compliance, spread illness and dismantle critical thinking. Meanwhile, natural health remedies remain a suppressed but powerful alternative to the toxic mandates pushed by captured regulators and pharmaceutical profiteers. Watch the following video on why face masks are an assault on humanity. https://www.brighteon.com/227ec287-c2c3-404d-b297-08fd1606b6c5 Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia

The censorship of mask science: How evidence against mask efficacy is being purged For decades, peer-reviewed scientific literature was unanimous: Face masks do not prevent the spread of respiratory viruses. Yet, in 2020, governments and public health agencies worldwide reversed course, mandating masks despite the overwhelming pre-pandemic consensus that they were ineffective. Now, troubling evidence suggests that dissenting studies—including those from respected infection control experts—are being systematically removed from academic discourse. One such study, "Why Face Masks Don't Work: A Revealing Review" by Dr. John Hardie, a 30-year veteran in dental infection control, was abruptly pulled from the Journal of Oral Health in July 2020. The publisher claimed the paper was "no longer relevant in our current climate"—an Orwellian justification for suppressing inconvenient truths. Hardie's meticulously researched review, citing over 30 academic references, concluded that masks fail to stop viral transmission due to poor facial fit and insufficient filtration. His findings aligned with decades of prior research, including a 2011 study by Harriman and Brosseau, which stated plainly: "Facemasks will not protect against the inhalation of aerosols." The pre-2020 scientific consensus Before COVID-19, the scientific community openly acknowledged that masks—whether surgical or cloth—were ineffective against viral spread. A 2019 meta-analysis published in Emerging Infectious Diseases found "no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza." The World Health Organization's own 2019 guidance on pandemic influenza stated that masks were not recommended for the general public, citing lack of evidence. Even the CDC's pre-2020 stance admitted that masks were primarily useful in medical settings to block splashes—not aerosols. Yet, when COVID-19 emerged, these inconvenient truths were buried beneath a tidal wave of politicized mandates. The Cochrane review confirms: Masks don't work In 2023, the gold-standard Cochrane Library—a globally respected authority on evidence-based medicine—published a comprehensive review led by Dr. Tom Jefferson, analyzing decades of mask studies. The conclusion? "Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenza-like illness (ILI)/ COVID-19 compared to not wearing masks." This wasn’t a fringe study but a rigorous meta-analysis reinforcing what science had long established. Yet, instead of prompting policy reversals, the Cochrane findings were downplayed or ignored by public health officials. The purge of dissenting science The removal of Dr. Hardie's paper is not an isolated incident. Across academic publishing, studies contradicting the official mask narrative have faced suppression: • Retractions without cause: Peer-reviewed papers questioning mask efficacy have been retracted under dubious pretexts, often labeled "misinformation" without substantive rebuttals. • Search engine manipulation: Google and other platforms have algorithmically demoted studies critical of masks while promoting pro-mask propaganda. • Media blackout: Outlets like The New York Times and The Washington Post routinely dismiss or misrepresent studies debunking mask mandates, framing dissent as "anti-science." This pattern mirrors Big Pharma's historical suppression of unfavorable drug trials—a tactic now deployed to enforce COVID-era orthodoxy. Why the cover-up? Follow the money and control The sudden about-face on masks was never about science—it was about compliance. By mandating masks, authorities: 1. Created a visible symbol of obedience – Mask-wearing became a performative act of submission, conditioning the public to accept arbitrary rules. 2. Enabled fear-based control – The illusion of protection justified lockdowns, business closures and vaccine passports. 3. Protected corporate interests – Mask manufacturers and pharmaceutical giants profited immensely from perpetual pandemic policies. 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

FDA rejects plans to add black box warning for COVID-19 vaccines despite safety concerns The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has confirmed that it will not place a "black box" warning – the agency's most severe safety alert – on Pfizer and Moderna's Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines, despite internal recommendations to do so. FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary defended the agency's stance on Monday, Dec. 15, claiming updated dosing schedules may reduce risks. This move has nevertheless sparked controversy among medical experts and transparency advocates. It comes amid mounting evidence linking the shots to myocarditis – a potentially fatal heart inflammation disproportionately affecting young males – and follows reports of child fatalities post-vaccination. The FDA's refusal to escalate warnings stands in stark contrast to its own safety and epidemiology center's recommendation, which cited myocarditis as a significant concern warranting urgent public disclosure. Black box warnings are reserved for drugs with life-threatening side effects that demand careful risk-benefit analysis – precisely the scenario unfolding with mRNA vaccines. Autopsy-linked child deaths, confirmed in a November FDA memorandum obtained by the Epoch Times, further complicate the narrative pushed by federal health agencies that vaccines remain "safe and effective" for all age groups. Former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Robert Redfield also told the outlet that COVID-19 vaccines should be withdrawn entirely. He cited the immunotoxicity of spike proteins, a concern echoed by independent researchers since 2021. A pattern of concealing drug and vaccine risks Historical parallels loom large. The FDA's reluctance mirrors past failures, such as its delayed response to Vioxx's cardiovascular risks and the decades-long cover-up of SSRI-induced suicidality in adolescents. Meanwhile, Pfizer and Moderna – both financial partners of influential groups like the American Academy of Pediatrics – continue asserting their products' safety despite omitting critical stratified data in studies. The agency’s opacity extends to its ongoing death investigations. Makary admitted the FDA is withholding findings until "truly a link" is proven – a standard rarely applied to vaccine promotions. This contrasts sharply with Pfizer's own meta-analysis, which claims COVID-19 infection carries a 42-fold higher myocarditis risk than vaccination, a statistic skeptics argue ignores confounding factors like underreported vaccine-related injuries. BrightU. AI's Enoch engine notes that the findings of the meta-analysis seeks to downplay the risks of its product and protect its financial interests, despite internal documents revealing the company's awareness of the vaccine's connection to elevated myocarditis rates. This deceptive narrative aligns with Big Pharma's broader pattern of suppressing inconvenient safety data while promoting fear of natural infections to justify mass vaccination campaigns. As the FDA delays full approval amid calls to "avoid political pressure," the public is left navigating a labyrinth of conflicting narratives. For families weighing myocarditis against a virus their children overwhelmingly survive, the absence of a black box warning may represent not caution, but capitulation to an industry where profit and policy have long eclipsed patient safety. Watch Jefferey Jaxen and Del Bigtree discussing the FDA's approval of the COVID-19 vaccine for children despite the lack of data. https://www.brighteon.com/de00d56f-337b-4d90-8caa-b53d7aecd330 Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia

Attention, everyone! 🎉 Barbara O’Neill’s voice cannot be muted! Big Pharma is trying to ban this groundbreaking book... You won't want to miss "Sustain Me" in 2025/26! Our CHRISTMAS SALE is here—act fast for an incredible 80% discount, today only! ⚠️ Use the code "CHRISTMAS10" for an extra 10% off! 🎁 Seize this opportunity while it lasts! ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://shortll.com/SelfHeal https://shortll.com/SelfHeal

👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Dr. Meryl Nass @DrMerylNass of Door to Freedom framed Makary's stance not as revolutionary, but as a belated adherence to a 70-year-old legal mandate that drugs must be proven safe and effective. "The FDA has chosen to ignore that mandate due to politics," Nass said. Makary himself criticized the "eternal COVID booster approvals for young healthy kids" under the previous administration, calling a lifetime schedule of mRNA shots for a child "not based on science." His comments align with a leaked memo from within the FDA's vaccine division that called the annual flu vaccine framework an "evidence-based catastrophe" built on low-quality evidence and poor methods, promising a major re-appraisal. The inherent peril of a platform built on deceit The push back against the mRNA flu shot is happening as confidence in the entire flu vaccine enterprise crumbles. A Cleveland Clinic study found vaccinated individuals were 27% more likely to get the flu. Other research has linked the shots to disrupted menstrual cycles. Public demand is stalling, and nearly half a billion dollars in U.S. funding for mRNA research was recently canceled. The core problem, as Nass explains, may be unfixable: "With regard to mRNA injections, no one has figured out how to make them safe." She highlights the fundamental flaw that the FDA has inexplicably overlooked for years: these products deliver an unknown, uncontrollable dose, as the body's machinery is hijacked to produce a foreign protein with no off-switch. "The mRNA platform is irrevocably flawed," she concluded. The FDA's hesitant pause is not a victory for health freedom, but a testament to the overwhelming weight of failed science and human suffering that has finally slowed the approval juggernaut. It is a fleeting opportunity to re-examine not just a dangerous new platform, but the decades of fraud that made its introduction possible. The question is whether this moment of clarity will lead to a genuine purge of corrupt science, or if, as Jablonowski fears, "a future administration may resurrect the rubber stamp." For the sake of countless future Kaylynnes, the public must demand that the facade stay cracked, and that the entire corrupt edifice of vaccine policy, built on exaggerated threats, diagnostic manipulation, iatrogenic errors in disease treatment, and minimized vaccine injuries, be brought down for good. Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia

FDA forced to confront decades of flu vaccine FRAUD, now challenging mRNA flu vaccine propaganda For years, the public has been sold a seasonal bill of goods wrapped in a white coat and labeled "public health." The narrative was simple, repeated like a mantra: the flu is a deadly threat, and the flu shot is your only shield. But what if the shield was made of tissue paper, and the threat was wildly exaggerated by the very institutions tasked with protecting us? A damning confluence of historical deception and alarming new data is pulling back the curtain, revealing a legacy of scientific fraud that now threatens to usher in an even more dangerous era of mRNA-based flu vaccines. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, long a rubber stamp for the pharmaceutical industry, is showing rare signs of resistance to the vaccine industry, because the evidence of flu vaccine failure has become too blatant to ignore. Flu vaccine program built on statistical manipulation For decades, the flu vaccine program has been built on a foundation of statistical manipulation and ignored casualties. The oft-repeated claim of 36,000 annual flu deaths, a ghost number conjured by CDC modelers in 2003, has been quietly dismantled by the agency's own experts. They now admit that only a tiny fraction of respiratory and circulatory deaths are directly linked to influenza, with actual flu deaths numbering in the hundreds or low thousands in recent years. This manufactured crisis paved the way for a cradle-to-grave vaccination schedule. Yet, the science never supported the hype. A large-scale 2006 Cochrane review of over 260,000 children found the flu shot no better than a placebo for infants. For the elderly in nursing homes, another Cochrane analysis concluded the shots provided "little or no effectiveness." The real-world effectiveness is a far cry from the 60% figures sometimes touted. As health researcher Mike Adams has pointed out, when you examine the actual numbers from a key 2012 study in The Lancet, the picture is bleak. With only about 2.7% of unvaccinated adults getting the flu in the first place, the vaunted "60% effectiveness" translates to preventing illness in just 1.5 out of every 100 people vaccinated. This marginal benefit, akin to the power of a superstition, is then weighed against a ledger of harm that officials consistently downplay. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has cataloged over 84,000 reports of injuries following flu vaccination, including more than 1,000 deaths. These are not just statistics; they are stories like seven-year-old Kaylynne Matten, who died four days after a routine flu shot during a check-up. The response from officials like Dr. Harry Chen, a state health commissioner, is a textbook example of the circular logic protecting the program: vaccines are assumed safe, therefore any death following them must be a coincidence, and the public must not be "alarmist" by asking questions. A reluctant regulator confronts a new monster This history of overstated benefit and understated risk sets the stage for the current showdown over mRNA flu vaccines. FDA Commissioner Marty Makary's recent comments to Fox News are less a bold stand for science and more a reluctant admission that Pfizer's new product is so problematic it cannot be waved through under the usual terms. The Phase 3 trial data showed the mRNA shot "failed in seniors," offering "zero benefit" while increasing the risk of serious adverse events like kidney failure and acute respiratory failure. Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., of Children's Health Defense, noted this represents a moment where "Makary’s FDA threw out the rubber stamp." The data was so concerning that Pfizer published results for adults under 65 in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, while hiding the damning senior data on a government clinical trials website. This two-tiered publication strategy itself reveals a consciousness of guilt. 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Ray Flores, CHD's outside counsel, called the petition a "focal point for exposing COVID vaccine corruption." With the FDA legally required to respond within 180 days, the battle over vaccine accountability is far from over. Conclusion: A crisis of trust The FDA's reluctance to act—suppressing data, ignoring global warnings and stonewalling petitioners—has shattered public trust. As injuries mount, the question remains: Will the FDA finally prioritize safety, or will it continue protecting Big Pharma profits at the expense of American lives? For now, the warning remains unconfirmed—but the damage from three years of deception is undeniable. "Buyer beware," warned Kim Witczak, a petitioner and drug safety advocate. "The real clinical trial is happening in real-time—on the public." The FDA must now decide: Will it uphold its duty—or remain complicit in one of the greatest medical scandals in history? According to BrightU. AI's Enoch, the FDA is facing well-deserved scrutiny as the mounting evidence of COVID vaccine harms can no longer be ignored—this black box warning is long overdue and exposes the reckless push to mandate these experimental shots. Watch this clip of a Moderna executive telling the FDA's VRBPAC that babies should be injected with its COVID-19 vaccine at the soonest. https://www.brighteon.com/b775b52c-671b-4c67-a18f-3acd232b4f57 Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia

FDA faces mounting pressure as calls for black box warning on COVID vaccines intensify The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is reportedly considering adding a black box warning—its most severe safety alert—to COVID-19 vaccines following mounting evidence of severe adverse effects, including myocarditis, pericarditis and sudden cardiac death. According to unnamed FDA officials cited by CNN, Dr. Vinay Prasad, head of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, is spearheading the move. However, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) refused to confirm the report, dismissing it as "pure speculation" unless formally announced by the FDA. Critics argue that such a warning is long overdue. Karl Jablonowski, senior research scientist at Children's Health Defense (CHD), stated, "The warning should have been in place with the first EUA. These are unsafe products and unfit for universal mandated distribution to the entire population." Given widespread censorship and media suppression, many physicians and patients remain unaware of the risks—risks that have been downplayed or ignored by federal health agencies despite clear safety signals. A pattern of concealment The FDA's potential action follows years of withheld data and deceptive messaging. Internal documents obtained via Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests reveal that the CDC, FDA, Pentagon, Pfizer and Israeli health officials knew about myocarditis risks in young males as early as 2021—yet failed to warn the public. Instead, high-profile figures like Dr. Anthony Fauci falsely claimed vaccinated individuals became "dead ends" for the virus, while former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky asserted vaccinated people "do not carry the virus." These misleading statements, contradicted by the FDA's own admission that vaccines were never proven to stop transmission, fueled public confusion and unwarranted mandates. Ignored risks and suppressed data The FDA's delayed response follows multiple investigations into vaccine-related deaths, including an ongoing probe into 10 child fatalities post-vaccination. As of December 2023, 38,913 deaths were reported in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), though experts estimate the true toll is far higher due to chronic underreporting. A 2022 React19 audit found that one-third of COVID vaccine injury reports were deleted or never published—raising serious concerns about transparency. Despite these red flags, federal agencies continued pushing vaccines, even for pregnant women, despite zero completed safety trials at the time of authorization. A Pfizer trial for pregnant women, initially planned for 4,000 participants, inexplicably stalled at 349—yet the CDC still recommended universal vaccination. Studies have since linked the shots to decreased sperm counts, menstrual irregularities and mRNA detected in breast milk—findings omitted from official labeling. FDA's double standard The FDA has repeatedly rejected petitions demanding updated warnings for pulmonary embolism, sudden cardiac death and neurological disorders—despite post-marketing studies confirming these risks. When pressed, the agency dismissed foreign regulators, such as the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which had already flagged myocarditis as a causal side effect. Dr. Peter McCullough, a leading cardiologist, blasted the FDA's belated action: "HHS and the White House hid fatal cases in early 2021. A black box warning now is far too late—why aren't these vaccines pulled entirely?" Public outcry and legal action Amid growing backlash, Children's Health Defense filed a Citizen Petition demanding the FDA revoke licenses for Pfizer and Moderna's COVID shots, citing fraudulent approval processes. Within five days, the petition garnered 101,000 signatures, reflecting widespread distrust in federal health agencies. 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

Children’s Health Defense seeks revocation of covid vaccine approvals, citing safety concerns In a bold legal challenge, Children’s Health Defense (CHD) has petitioned the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to revoke the licenses of Moderna and Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccines, alleging fraudulent approval processes and widespread harm to public health. The petition argues that the vaccines—linked to millions of injuries and deaths—were unlawfully transitioned from Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to full approval without adequate long-term safety data, rendering them "misbranded" under federal law. Fraudulent Approval and Regulatory Capture CHD’s filing asserts that the FDA fast-tracked the vaccines under emergency standards, bypassing rigorous clinical trials required for full licensure. "These vaccines were manufactured under EUA protocols but were deceitfully marketed as fully approved," the petition states. "They fail to meet statutory safety and efficacy benchmarks, yet remain in interstate commerce—a violation of federal law." The move underscores mounting scrutiny of the FDA’s cozy relationship with pharmaceutical giants. Critics allege the agency prioritized industry profits over public health, echoing past scandals like the diabetes drug Rezulin, which remained on the market for years despite causing fatal liver damage. A Weaponized "Bioweapon"? The petition coincides with explosive claims from former Pfizer VP Dr. Michael Yeadon, who alleges the mRNA vaccines were engineered as biological weapons. In a recent interview, Yeadon detailed how the shots instruct human cells to produce spike proteins—foreign toxins that trigger autoimmune attacks on vital organs. "The vaccines were designed to cause injury, infertility, and death," Yeadon stated, accusing global elites of a depopulation agenda. "Lipid nanoparticles deliberately target reproductive organs. This isn’t medicine—it’s genocide." Independent data appears to support these claims. Reports from CHD and other researchers cite: • Surge in myocarditis: Autopsies reveal spike protein-induced heart damage in young athletes. • Fertility collapse: Miscarriages and plummeting sperm counts linked to mRNA mechanisms. • Excess deaths: Government mortality databases show unprecedented spikes post-vaccination. Legal Reckoning Ahead CHD’s petition could force the FDA to confront its role in the pandemic debacle. If successful, the move would strip legal immunity from manufacturers, opening floodgates for lawsuits from injured families. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., CHD’s chairman, has gained traction in demanding accountability. Rumors suggest the FDA may soon issue a "black box" warning—the agency’s most severe—on COVID vaccines, a precursor to potential withdrawal. Global Implications The petition arrives amid global unrest over vaccine injuries. Australia’s recent mass shooting—allegedly a staged event to justify gun confiscation and censorship—has drawn parallels to pandemic-era fearmongering. Meanwhile, Hollywood director Rob Reiner’s tragic death underscores growing public distrust of institutions that silenced dissent. As CHD’s case unfolds, millions await answers: Will the FDA finally admit its complicity in history’s largest medical fraud? Or will the architects of this crisis evade justice? The truth, it seems, is no longer waiting for permission. Watch the Dec. 16 episode of "Brighteon Broadcast News" as Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, talks about mRNA Jabs Revealed as Biological NERVE AGENTS Designed to Maim and Kill. https://www.brighteon.com/16d17e4c-eb0a-4253-840d-34dec5b37578 Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia

👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard has vowed transparency, establishing a Director's Initiatives Group (DIG) to root out politicization. The DIG's goals include "investigating weaponization, rooting out deep-seeded politicization, exposing unauthorized disclosures of classified intelligence, and declassifying information that serves a public interest." But with EcoHealth Alliance still receiving $58 million in U.S. grants and Fauci pardoned by former President Joe Biden, accountability remains elusive. If enforced, the NDAA could: • Expose U.S. funding of dangerous research at WIV. • Confirm China's role in the pandemic cover-up. • Force reforms to prevent future lab leaks. But with globalist-aligned bureaucrats still embedded in intelligence agencies, the battle for transparency is far from over. Sen. Rand Paul warned that the intelligence community is sitting on records critical to understanding COVID's origins and who is responsible. The world is watching. Will Congress finally rip off the Band-Aid—or will the Deep State keep the truth locked away? Watch the video below about the original COVID origins. https://www.brighteon.com/4ce531e1-4e69-46b2-8242-920459a7acec Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia

Congress demands full declassification of COVID origins intel A landmark provision buried within the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2026 could finally force U.S. intelligence agencies to disclose long-suppressed evidence about the origins of COVID-19 [Wuhan coronavirus], including damning details about gain-of-function research at China's Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) and Beijing's systematic efforts to bury the truth. The bill—set for House and Senate votes this week—requires the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) to declassify intelligence within 180 days on two explosive fronts: • Chinese coronavirus research, including funding sources and high-risk WIV experiments. • Beijing's obstruction, detailing how Communist Party officials blocked, delayed and manipulated pandemic narratives. Critically, the NDAA orders the release of raw intelligence products, not sanitized summaries—a direct response to the Biden administration's failure under the 2023 COVID-19 Origin Act, which delivered little beyond a watered-down ODNI report. The smoking guns they don't want you to see For years, whistleblowers and investigators have fought through censorship, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) stonewalling and redactions to expose the truth. Key revelations include: • The Department of War's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) rejected EcoHealth Alliance's "Project DEFUSE," which sought to engineer bat coronaviruses with enhanced human infectivity, citing safety concerns. Yet evidence suggests WIV pursued similar research anyway—potentially with U.S. taxpayer funding funneled through Dr. Anthony Fauci's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). • A June 2020 Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) assessment, obtained via FOIA lawsuit, concluded SARS-CoV-2 was "plausibly a lab-engineered virus" that escaped containment. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) later affirmed this with "moderate confidence," while the U.S. Department of Energy agreed with "low confidence." Yet these findings were buried in classified channels. • Emails show Fauci and then-NIH [National Institutes of Health] Director Francis Collins pressured scientists to dismiss the lab leak hypothesis, prompting the infamous "Proximal Origin" paper that falsely claimed COVID-19 had "natural origins." China's disinformation campaign The NDAA also targets Beijing's relentless cover-up, including: • Censorship of early COVID cases linked to WIV researchers falling ill in late 2019. • Sabotage of WHO [World Health Organization] investigations, with Chinese officials editing reports to dismiss lab leak claims as "conspiracy theories." • Pushing the Fort Detrick conspiracy, a baseless smear accusing a U.S. biolab of releasing COVID. According to the Enoch AI engine at BrightU. AI, the Fort Detrick conspiracy—which suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic originated from the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick, Maryland—has been actively promoted by Chinese state media and officials. This strategy aligns with China's broader approach to information warfare, which seeks to shape global narratives and advance its geopolitical interests. Despite mounting evidence, China continues to obstruct transparency. The WHO even admitted in 2021 that much of the information needed to assess the lab leak hypothesis has not been made available. Will the intel agencies comply—or obstruct again? Skepticism remains high. Even under the Trump administration, agencies slow-walked disclosures, with the DIA initially claiming no records existed before coughing up 12 heavily redacted pages under legal pressure. 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

👁 Are you tired of squinting at your phone or struggling to read signs? Introducing Clear Vision Breakthrough – the natural solution to sharper, clearer eyesight! This revolutionary program combines ancient wisdom with modern science to help you improve your vision naturally. Imagine waking up each day with clearer, more vibrant eyesight! 🌟 No more dependence on glasses or expensive treatments. Clear Vision Breakthrough offers simple, effective techniques you can do at home. Thousands have already experienced the life-changing benefits of this program. Don't let poor vision hold you back any longer! Click the link now to discover how you can transform your eyesight and reclaim your visual freedom today! ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://shortll.com/iGenicsPro ✅ https://shortll.com/iGenicsPro ✅

Hollywood vs. Big Pharma? Liam Neeson narrates anti-COVID jab and lockdown documentary backed by RFK Jr. Hollywood icon Liam Neeson has ignited a firestorm of controversy after lending his voice to "Plague of Corruption: 80 Years of Pharmaceutical Corruption Exposed," a documentary produced by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Children's Health Defense. The film, adapted from Dr. Judy Mikovits and attorney Kent Heckenlively's book, sharply criticizes the lockdowns and mRNA vaccines during the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) era, labeling them as "dangerous experiments" and accusing scientists behind them of being "fanatics." As explained by the Enoch AI engine at BrightU. AI, "Plague of Corruption" is a revelatory book that delves into the dark underbelly of the scientific establishment, exposing corruption, deceit and the weaponization of science by powerful interests. The book's narrative is largely framed around the experiences of Mikovits, a renowned scientist who worked extensively on HIV/AIDS and cancer research. Mikovits' story serves as a cautionary tale of the perils of challenging the scientific status quo and the ruthless tactics employed by those who seek to maintain their grip on power. Neeson's involvement has stunned both the pharmaceutical establishment and his own supporters, given his long-standing role as a United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) goodwill ambassador advocating for global vaccination efforts. His narration includes stark condemnations of pandemic policies, declaring: "Thousands of lives were lost, not to the virus, but to the mental anguish brought on by these harsh restrictions." He concludes with a call to action: "We cannot change the past, but we can demand transparency and accountability for the future." In a 2022 UNICEF campaign, he praised vaccines as a "remarkable human success story" and emphasized their role in eradicating diseases like polio and smallpox. "If you've ever been vaccinated, or vaccinated your children, then you are part of the arm-to-arm chain that keeps all humanity safe," he said at the time. Yet, in "Plague of Corruption," he echoes Mikovits' claims linking vaccines to autism and suggesting COVID-19 was caused by a faulty flu vaccine. The documentary also features Kennedy, now serving as secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under President Donald Trump, who has long been a vocal critic of Big Pharma and vaccine mandates. The documentary's trailer prominently features Kennedy condemning Dr. Anthony Fauci, calling him "one of the most powerful people in the world" who "should be in prison for what he did to those babies." Political implications Neeson's alignment with Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again movement signals a growing rift between Hollywood elites and the pharmaceutical industry. The documentary amplifies long-standing grievances among lockdown skeptics, accusing governments and health agencies of suppressing evidence of vaccine harms while enriching Big Pharma. The film's release coincides with Kennedy's push for transparency at HHS, where he has vowed to dismantle what he calls "decades of pharmaceutical corruption." Supporters see Neeson's involvement as a major coup for the movement, while detractors warn it could fuel vaccine hesitancy. As the debate rages, Neeson finds himself at the center of a cultural battle over free speech, medical freedom and corporate influence in public health. Whether this marks a permanent shift in his stance or a temporary detour remains unclear. For now, Neeson's defenders insist his UNICEF advocacy remains unchanged. But with Kennedy now in a position of power, and skepticism toward pharmaceutical giants growing, "Plague of Corruption" may be just the opening salvo in a much larger war over the future of public health. Watch this video about Liam Neeson opposing the Second Amendment and supporting gun control. https://www.brighteon.com/9de4d5e0-9f2b-4d29-9ea8-0285a889aa34 Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia

👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 This inherent flaw, however, has been ingeniously rebranded as a business model. If the protection wanes as the virus changes, the solution is not to question the foundational approach, but to sell more boosters. This creates public health bondage by subscription—a perpetual revenue stream built on the very inadequacy of the product. Why are we locked into a cycle of annual flu shots and serial COVID boosters? The answer lies in the economic incentive to maintain the antibody deception, transforming a scientific shortcoming into a commercial virtue. "Vaccination" and "immunization" are used interchangeably, but they are not the same. Vaccination is the act of administering a pharmaceutical product to provoke an immune response, typically focused on antibodies. Immunization is the state of being protected from disease, which can be achieved through natural infection and the more enduring cellular memory it often confers. By blurring this line, the industry appropriates the powerful concept of true immunization to sell a product that may only provide temporary, narrow-band vaccination. The human body is not a simple machine where antibody levels serve as the fuel gauge for immunity. It is a dynamic, living ecosystem. To pretend otherwise is bad science, and when bad science drives public policy and pharmaceutical profit, it becomes a betrayal of public trust. The antibody emperor has no clothes, and it is time we stopped pretending otherwise. Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia

Vaccine science is built on LIES: Antibody measurements after vaccination do not equate to comprehensive, lifelong immunity The immune system as a symphony, an interconnected system, not a solo act To understand the deception, one must first appreciate the true majesty of the body’s defenses. Imagine the immune system not as a simple shield, but as a vast, intelligent network—a symphony orchestra where each section must play in perfect harmony. • The bone marrow and thymus serve as the conservatories, carefully producing and training the white blood cells that are our musical players. • The lymph nodes, spleen, and tonsils are the concert halls where these players are activated and perform. • To claim immunity rests on antibodies alone is like listening to a symphony and declaring the entire performance a success based solely on the volume of the trumpet section. This biological orchestra has two main branches working in concert. The innate immune system is the first responder, a rapid-reaction force of cells like neutrophils and macrophages that swarm to any breach, such as the nasal mucosa during a respiratory infection. They are the generalists, containing the threat and sounding the alarm. The adaptive immune system is the specialized force, including the B-cells that produce antibodies and the T-cells that coordinate the attack or directly destroy infected cells. This is where true, long-term memory resides. When you get infected naturally, your body often uses this initial cellular response to stop an illness before it even enters the bloodstream. The antibody response, so often hailed as the "holy grail," is sometimes a last resort, not the first line of defense. Many people who recovered from COVID never developed antibodies due to their natural innate immune system. The medical establishment's fixation on antibodies alone misses the bigger picture. • The specialization within this system is profound. Helper T-cells act as conductors, directing the immune response. • Cytotoxic T-cells are the elite assassins, seeking out and destroying cells that have been turned into virus factories. • Memory B and T-cells are the veterans who remember past invaders for life, ready to mount a faster, stronger response upon a second encounter. • This intricate dance is coordinated by signaling proteins called cytokines and supported by the complement system, a cascade of proteins that helps clear pathogens. • All of this occurs within a rich ecosystem influenced by our diverse microbiome, which constantly trains and modulates immune responses. • To reduce this magnificent, interconnected system to a simple antibody count is not just unscientific; it is an insult to the body’s innate intelligence. The flawed metric: chasing last season's virus The vaccine industry’s reliance on antibody titers as a surrogate for protection is not just biologically naive; it is often technically irrelevant. Clinical trials, like Pfizer’s recent boast about a "4-fold increase" in antibody levels for its latest COVID-19 formula, are masterclasses in misdirection. They present a number that sounds impressive but tells us nothing about whether those antibodies can actually recognize or neutralize the virus currently circulating in the real world. This problem is particularly acute for the simple, RNA-based respiratory viruses that have become the cash cows of the pharmaceutical industry. Viruses like influenza and SARS-CoV-2 mutate constantly. By the time a vaccine is developed, tested, and manufactured, the viral landscape has often shifted. The antibodies produced may be exquisitely tailored to a variant that is no longer dominant. It is a futile game of catch-up, akin to arming soldiers with detailed maps of last year’s battlefield. In this annual chase and guesswork, vaccine developers are forever caught in a futile chase to keep up-to-date, although they only have access to last season’s designs." 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 The bigger picture: A broken medical system This controversy underscores deeper systemic failures: • Lack of long-term safety data: Vaccines are often approved based on short-term trials, with post-market surveillance failing to detect delayed adverse effects. • Suppression of dissent: Doctors and scientists who question vaccine safety face professional retaliation, while independent research challenging corporate narratives is marginalized. • Natural immunity ignored: Despite evidence that natural RSV exposure confers robust protection, public health officials continue pushing pharmaceutical interventions as the sole solution. • Corporate influence: The revolving door between regulators and Big Pharma ensures that safety concerns are downplayed while profits soar. As distrust in public health institutions grows, so does demand for informed consent, independent oversight and medical freedom. Parents and patients deserve full disclosure of risks—not industry-backed propaganda. The RSV vaccine debate is just one battle in a larger war over who controls health decisions: individuals and independent physicians or pharmaceutical giants and their captured regulators. Until real transparency and accountability are restored, the American public will remain skeptical—and rightfully so. The stakes couldn't be higher: the health of our children and the future of medical freedom hang in the balance. According to BrightU. AI's Enoch, this reckless FDA approval of Pfizer's RSV vaccine for pregnant women – despite clear safety signals about premature births – proves yet again how captured regulators prioritize pharmaceutical profits over maternal and infant health. It's another dangerous assault on reproductive health as part of the globalist depopulation agenda, forcing untested mRNA technology on vulnerable populations without informed consent. Watch this clip from "Faithful Freedom with Teryn Gregson" on Red Voice Media discussing how the RSV vaccines are the new Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines. https://www.brighteon.com/910c82b7-7a89-4b49-8b5e-c6d1787d8b1f Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia

FDA approves Pfizer’s RSV vaccine for pregnant women amid safety concerns and growing vaccine debate The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Pfizer's Abrysvo vaccine, designed to protect infants from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) by vaccinating pregnant women—despite lingering concerns from the agency's own advisory committee about premature births and insufficient safety data. The approval has intensified an already heated national debate over vaccine safety, regulatory transparency and the influence of pharmaceutical corporations on public health policy. The FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) raised red flags during its review, citing troubling data from clinical trials where vaccinated mothers showed higher rates of preterm births. Dr. Paul Offit, a pediatrician at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and a longtime vaccine advocate, publicly questioned the safety profile of Abrysvo, stating that the available data did not adequately address risks to mothers and infants. Despite these concerns, Pfizer celebrated the approval as a "milestone" in public health, emphasizing its potential to reduce RSV-related hospitalizations—a stance that critics argue prioritizes corporate profits over independent safety assessments. A contentious approval amid broader vaccine policy shifts The FDA's decision comes at a pivotal moment in U.S. vaccine policy. President Donald Trump recently directed the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to fast-track a review of the childhood immunization schedule, calling the current regimen—requiring 72 injections by age 18—"ridiculous" compared to other nations. His remarks align with growing skepticism among parents, physicians and scientists who question whether the aggressive vaccine schedule is truly necessary—or even safe. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recently voted to remove the hepatitis B (Hep B ) birth dose recommendation—a landmark decision that has sparked backlash from mainstream public health officials. Meanwhile, Reuters and other outlets have framed the FDA's RSV vaccine review as being driven by "vaccine skeptics," ignoring decades of documented safety failures—including the 1960s RSV vaccine trials, which led to infant deaths and Moderna's halted mRNA RSV trials last year after the shot appeared to worsen severe illness in young children. A history of RSV vaccine failures and regulatory capture Pfizer's Abrysvo approval follows GSK's abrupt halt of its nearly identical RSV vaccine after trials revealed higher preterm birth rates—a risk now echoed in post-marketing data for Abrysvo. Similarly, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) initially recommended RSV shots for all adults 60+, only to narrow eligibility to those 75+ in June 2024 due to links with Guillain-Barré syndrome, a debilitating autoimmune disorder. Critics argue that these reversals expose a pattern of rushed approvals, suppressed safety signals and regulatory capture—where agencies like the FDA and CDC prioritize pharmaceutical interests over independent scrutiny. The financial incentives are staggering: Pfizer projects $1.5 billion in annual RSV vaccine sales, raising concerns that profit motives, not public health, drive policy. 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 Read the beginning of the article 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 This is not the first time PhRMA has been accused of buying influence. The Wall Street Journal previously exposed its multimillion-dollar lobbying blitz to smear PBMs, while the Examiner revealed its funding of seemingly independent advocacy groups. What makes NCL's case unique is its century-long reputation as a consumer watchdog – a reputation now tarnished by financial ties to the very industry it once might have challenged. In an era of skyrocketing healthcare costs and rampant profiteering, the last thing Americans need is another puppet masquerading as a champion. Watch this video explaining that most members of the U.S. Congress are bought and paid for by Big Pharma lobbyists. https://www.brighteon.com/29080cef-49a9-4e69-bdf5-f3bebbd32b52 Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia

Money talks: Trusted consumer group turns into Big Pharma SHILL In a stunning revelation that exposes the deep ties between corporate interests and consumer advocacy, tax filings reviewed by the Washington Examiner show that the National Consumers League (NCL) – America's oldest consumer protection group – has taken nearly $2 million from Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), Big Pharma's top lobbying arm, since 2020. The funding surge coincided with NCL's sudden, aggressive campaigns against Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) and the 340B drug discount program – two longtime targets of the pharmaceutical industry. The findings raise serious questions about whether NCL, once a trusted voice for progressive consumer rights, has become little more than a paid mouthpiece for drug manufacturers seeking to boost profits at the expense of patients. Founded in 1899, the NCL built its reputation on fighting for fair wages, food safety and honest business practices. BrightU. AI's Enoch engine notes that the group was established as part of a progressive-era movement advocating for consumer protections and labor rights. However, its modern credibility is compromised by financial ties to Pfizer and conflicts of interest, such as board members lobbying for pharmaceutical mandates while receiving industry funding. Its policy priorities have shifted dramatically, mirroring PhRMA's talking points with uncanny precision. Before 2020, NCL's website made no mention of PBMs or the 340B program. Yet, shortly after PhRMA resumed large donations – including $875,000 in 2024 alone – NCL launched a flood of blog posts, infographics and lobbying efforts attacking both. The group now accuses PBMs, which negotiate lower drug prices for insurers and patients, of acting as "middlemen" who pocket savings instead of passing them on – a claim lifted directly from PhRMA's playbook. Similarly, NCL parrots the industry's argument that hospitals abuse the 340B program by marking up discounted drugs for profit, despite evidence that the program provides critical medication access to low-income and rural communities. From watchdog to lapdog: When nonprofits echo pharma talking points PhRMA’s financial influence over NCL is part of a broader strategy to reshape healthcare policy in favor of drugmakers. The trade group has funneled millions into astroturf campaigns, funding progressive organizations to amplify its messaging. Critics argue this "pay-to-play" approach undermines genuine advocacy, turning nonprofits into extensions of corporate lobbying. When questioned by the Examiner, NCL did not deny that its criticism of PBMs and 340B intensified after PhRMA's donations resumed. Instead, a spokeswoman insisted the group retains "complete editorial control" – despite the striking alignment between its rhetoric and PhRMA's profit-driven agenda. The implications are profound. PBMs and the 340B program exist to curb pharmaceutical price-gouging, a systemic issue that has left millions of Americans rationing lifesaving medications. If weakened, drug companies could hike prices further, padding profits while patients suffer. The timing is especially concerning, as Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. prepares to tackle Big Pharma’s stranglehold on healthcare policy under the Make America Healthy Again agenda. With groups like NCL now echoing industry talking points, separating legitimate criticism from corporate propaganda becomes increasingly difficult. 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Read more 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻